gasracafe.blogg.se

1. Hyper v vs virtualbox for xp install#
2. Hyper v vs virtualbox for xp windows 10#
3. Hyper v vs virtualbox for xp pro#

Hyper v vs virtualbox for xp windows 10#

I wouldn't care if there was a 10 or 20 percent performance loss using the VirtualBox over the Hyper-V, but 50 percent is too much and weird.Įxample CPU-Z results for my ThinkPad T590 with Intel Core i5-8265U, Windows 10 21H1 host, VirtualBox 6.1.24, Windows 10 21H1 guest with 2 vCPUs and 2 GB RAM: I could easily move to Hyper-V and forget, but I still like the VirtualBox user interface more and the networking is more flexible. And I tried both Host I/O cache options, no significant difference. But the operations aren't too much I/O bound, small files read/write only.

Hyper v vs virtualbox for xp pro#

One thing that may explain why there is no significant performance loss on the AMD PC is that the 980 Pro SSD is superfast, 10 times faster than the SSD on the laptop. Would running CPU-Z test on the Intel machines in both VirtualBox and Hyper-V make sense? And again, the same virtual machine works faster in Hyper-V on those two laptops.

Hyper v vs virtualbox for xp install#

To install and setup the complete environment takes two days, that's why I am saving my time by moving the virtual machines between physical computers. I don't have a free week for this, sorry. Scottgus1 wrote:To put it another way, if you make fresh VMs on each host, one for Hyper-V and one for Virtualbox, a total of 6 fresh VMs, and install the same test environment in each, does the same timing come out? Dec 2012, 01:20 Location: Czech Republic Primary OS: MS Windows 10 VBox Version: PUEL Guest OSses: Windows 10 64-bit Is there any explanation why there is no significant performance difference on AMD PC, but it runs two times faster in Hyper-V on both Intel laptops? One thing i noticed the CPU clock speed reported in Task Manager in VirtualBox guests is lower than in host and Hyper-V guest. Intel Core i5 2540M, 8 GB RAM, Intel 535 SSD - double performance in Hyper-V compared to VirtualBox Intel Core i5-8265U, 8 GB RAM, WDC SN720 SSD - double performance in Hyper-V compared to VirtualBox Hyper-V was uninstalled and disabled for VirtualBox tests, of course.ĪMD Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB RAM, Samsung SSD 980 Pro - no significant performance difference between VirtualBox and Hyper-V, approximately 5% slower in VirtualBox as expected No software was running on hosts, no 3rd party antivirus crap, Windows Defender disabled in guests. Laptops were always AC powered to get maximum performance. Performace tests were made by running unit tests (mostly CPU bound rather than I/O) in Visual Studio that takes several minutes. recommended settings of CPU and RAM in VirtualBox guests and then the same settings in Hyper-V. I converted the VirtualBox VDI to VHD and tried in Hyper-V on several machines. I am aware that Hyper-V is a different kind of software, but this my finding are strange anyway. I use Windows 10 圆4 host and guest (MSDN) for development (Visual Studio, MS SQL Server and so on).